B. Quinn, This new American drawings from John White, step one577-1590 (dos vols
2. William Camden, Historie . (London area, 1630), III, pp. 61-62; Jerome E. Brooks, Tobacco: the Background Portrayed . about Collection off George Arents (5 vols., New york, 1937-52), We, pp. 46-49; II, pp. 156-158; Roentgen. N. Salaman, The annals and you can Societal Dictate of Potato (Cambridge, 1949), pp. 83-96; Quinn, Roanoke Voyages , I, pp. 344-348.
BIGGES, WALTER. A great Summarie and you can Real Commentary regarding Sir Frances [sic] Drakes West Indian Voyage. (First-line of term and some statements cut.) With woodcut printer’s draw away from Richard Occupation towards the title. cuatro actually leaves, 37 (1) pp., 1 blank leaf. Short quarto. Morocco.
The following ENGLISH Model, typed a similar year since very first. Today’s Roger Ward version is apparently smaller notorious compared to the Richard Career blackpeoplemeet indir release (STC 3056) which preceded it the same 12 months–see the earlier matter. STC-Bishop-Ramage to find just cuatro duplicates of your own Ward version while the against eleven of the Field. The present copy provides the leaf before name, empty with the exception of new trademark-mark “A good,” plus the empty leaf towards the bottom.
F.” are delivered to sea to the February cuatro, 1589, for the true purpose of reconnoitering the brand new Iberian coasts when preparing getting the new Drake-Norris journey regarding 1589
STC 3057; Sabin 20841; Church 136 (note); Oceans (ed.), Genuine and you will Perfecte Newes . Syr Frauncis Drake , pp. 53-70; Quinn, ed., This new Roanoke Voyages , I, pp. 32-35.
“T. The guy gets development of future of one’s Invincible Armada of the prior 12 months: “And also as concerning past Fleete, [an effective marchant out-of Lisbone] sayth, regarding most of the boats and you will carvels of one’s Foreign-language Fleete discover come home but nine and you can thirtie. but most of all of the people you to came house passed away immediatly at their landing. In addition to the Duke of Medina is banished the newest Legal for good.” Which latter detail is pretty false–King Philip failed to blame brand new Duke to the inability away from the fresh Armada strategy. He and additionally provides particulars of an effective naval step out-of Lisbon inside hence a great Greek watercraft full of wine regarding Crete is captured, and you may predicts high victory on the coming attack.
(WINGFIELD, ANTHONY). A real Coppie from a commentary published by a gentleman, working in the fresh new later Voyage away from Spaine and you can Portingale. 2 actually leaves, 58 pp., step 1 blank leaf. (Pp. 27-29 devoid of, given during the photostat.) Woodcut vignette with the title. Short quarto. Dated forums, leather straight back.
Basic Release, First Matter. Wingfield’s story is the most outlined membership extant of 1589 attack into the The country of spain required because of the Sir Francis Drake and you will Sir John Norreys (Norris), and this sailed of Plymouth on the April 17, 1589, and you can came back late when you look at the June. However, an enthusiastic unnumbered after checklist gives Wingfield as the author. 1
The new journey unsuccessful in its principal goal, the fresh raising out-of a rebellion from inside the A holiday in greece facing Queen Philip II away from Spain, and also the enthroning from Dom Antonio, the past men offshoot of one’s Aviz dynasty, inside the Philip’s put. They performed a certain amount of damage to Spanish naval delivery from the Corunna, along with certain marks of Armada of one’s earlier year; and over sixty vessels loaded with corn and naval offers which the fresh new English regarded as contraband was in fact drawn near Lisbon throughout the Hanse.
On STC the book are wrongly ascribed to help you King Elizabeth’s favourite, Robert Devereux, Earl of Essex, whom took part in the newest trip–far contrary to the Queen’s tend to–just like the a volunteer
Two issues of this work are extant; signature E (pp. 25-32), which relates events of the attack upon Lisbon, in some copies (including this one) contains a passage in praise of the Earl of Essex on p. 26 (E 1 verso). As Queen Elizabeth was highly displeased with the Earl’s running off on this voyage against her orders, it is perhaps likely that the issue with the passage is the earlier of the two.
